hair styles for women over 50 with fine

hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • Munna Bhai
    12-17 10:03 AM
    The letter does not say anything. It just says that your I-485 is denied.
    It does not give nay reason. It does not even say to appeal..

    Thanks

    uscis should tell you why?? contact uscis or your attorney. What is your gut feeling? Why it might got denied. What is your PD etc.





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women



  • akhilmahajan
    05-14 10:10 AM
    Any more updates from the texas service center for the approval of I140.............. i am still waiting for mine....... been more then 2 months now..........





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • shirish
    09-02 01:54 PM
    I am in the same situation. My lawyer sent the application with out medicals one day before the medical reports reached him.

    He is saying, he checked with USCIS customer service, that the medicals do expire after 12 months. So i will have to go for medical exam again when i get RFE.


    As explained earlier I proactively decided to send in the medicals with a copy of the receipt notices since I didn't want to waste processing time through RFEs and was under the impression that medicals expire in 12-18 mths. However, when I spoke to the lawyer about this she said: "The medicals do not expire any more . . . let's "keep our fingers crossed" that the medicals make it to your files; we usually wait for CIS to send us an RFE, as that way there is a bar code on the cover letter to help get the medical to the examiner who has the file."

    She also said that I wouldn't get any receipt notice or anything regarding the submission. So I guess I'll have to keep my fingers crossed.





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50 with fine. women over 50.
  • hair styles for women over 50 with fine. women over 50.



  • jcrajput
    07-21 03:51 PM
    We are planning to travel India and getting stamped at Mumbai (H1, H4). After taking an appointment, how to send papers to Mumbai consulate from USA? I heard that someone has to go personally to submit the papers. Also, should we send papers to VFS or US Consulate?

    Can anyone please guide or help?
    Thank you so much.
    Jignesh



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hairstyles.
  • hairstyles.



  • tiger05
    03-01 05:13 PM
    Hi,

    I am working for company A and I applied for H1 transfer to company B. They applied for premium processing on 25th and on 27th feb i got RFE.

    RFE is

    All payroll summaries (W-2 ) evidencing wages paid since you began work in H-1B status.

    I came to US on 2006 feb, the attorney is submitting my W2s on monday. But my 2006 W2 is not good i have only 20K on 2006 W2, 2007 and 2008 W2S are good.

    As my 2006 W2 is not good , does it effect my H1B transfer.

    Please let me know your thoughts.

    Thanks





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles women over
  • short hair styles women over



  • shiva7
    10-12 01:00 PM
    Don't post for receipts people... IV people don't like it.



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. cuts for women over 50.
  • cuts for women over 50.



  • conchshell
    07-30 12:43 PM
    Same situation happened to me - My status shows as card production ordered while hers have no update.

    The sad part is that I m continuing on H1 while she is working on her EAD and needs it approved soon

    sujith1, can you post when did you both filed for EAD, where, and when did you get approval for you only.

    Same here sujith1, I am on H1B (AOS) and she is working on her EAD.





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women



  • WaldenPond
    02-09 11:03 AM
    Hello,

    Could anybody please post the latest going on with today's hearing - Committee on Government Reform Hearing: U.S. Competiteveness.

    I am not able to find any news/update on this.

    Thanks,



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women



  • bklog_sufferer
    12-05 08:45 PM
    can anyone answer this please??





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • krishna_brc
    05-05 08:54 AM
    Yes, we don't need original I-485 receipt notice to travel.
    I traveled without original I-485.
    see below for USCIS note on this
    ----
    [Federal Register: November 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 211)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 61791-61793]
    From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr01no07-1]
    Rules and Regulations
    Federal Register
    __________________________________________________ ____________________
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
    week.
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
    8 CFR Part 245
    [CIS No. 2420-07; Docket No. USCIS-2007-0047]
    RIN 1615-AB62
    Removal of Receipt Requirement for Certain H and L Adjustment
    Applicants Returning From a Trip Outside the United States
    AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
    ACTION: Final rule.
    SUMMARY: This rule removes the requirement that certain H and L
    nonimmigrants returning to the United States following a trip abroad
    must present a receipt notice for their adjustment of status
    applications to avoid having such applications deemed abandoned. The
    purpose of this narrow change is to remove an unnecessary documentation
    requirement from the regulations that the Department of Homeland
    Security has determined causes an undue burden on H and L
    nonimmigrants.
    DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective November 1, 2007.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Vernon, Regulations and Product
    Management Division, Domestic Operations, U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
    Avenue, Room 2034, Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202) 272-8350.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Background
    Travel outside the United States for an alien who has filed Form I-
    485, ``Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status,''
    to obtain lawful permanent resident status under section 245 of the
    Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1255, may adversely
    affect that application unless the alien takes certain steps before the
    trip. Most applicants must obtain permission from U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services (USCIS) to travel prior to the trip, a process
    referred to as ``advance parole.'' See 8 CFR 212.5 (c) and (f). For
    these applicants, departing the United States without advance parole
    while their adjustment of status applications are pending results in
    automatic abandonment of the applications and constitutes grounds for
    denial. 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A) & (B).

    III. Rulemaking Requirements

    DHS finds that this rule relates to internal agency management,
    procedure, and practice and therefore is exempt from the public comment
    requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) under 5 U.S.C.
    553(b)(A). This rule does not alter substantive criteria by which USCIS
    will approve or deny applications or determine eligibility for any
    immigration benefit. Instead, this rule relieves a document
    presentation requirement for certain applicants for immigration
    benefits. Specifically, this rule removes the requirement that H-1/H-4
    and L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants present a Form I-797 receipt notice for their
    adjustment of status applications upon readmission to the United States
    after a trip abroad in order to avoid having their applications
    abandoned. This document presentation requirement is unnecessary since
    it concerns information that is already available to DHS. This final
    rule merely eliminates an unnecessary burden on these arriving aliens
    and streamlines agency management of its processes. As a result, DHS is
    not required to provide the public with an opportunity to submit
    comments on the subject matter of this rule.
    Moreover, DHS finds that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)
    to make the rule effective upon publication in the Federal Register
    without prior notice and public comment on the grounds that delaying
    implementation of this rule to allow for public comment would be
    impracticable and contrary to the public interest. As a result of
    USCIS's July 17, 2007, announcement that it would accept employment-
    based Forms I-485 filed by aliens whose priority dates are current
    under Department of State Visa Bulletin No. 107, USCIS received an
    unprecedented volume of employment-based applications for adjustment of
    status, including those filed by H and L nonimmigrants. Because of the
    recent surge in such filings, it will take several weeks for USCIS to
    enter the necessary data and issue Form I-797 receipt notices for
    employment-based adjustment of status applications. Therefore, it is
    important for this rule to take effect as soon as possible to avoid
    undue hardship on applicants who may need travel outside the United
    States prior to receiving the receipt notice.
    In addition, no substantive rights or obligations of the affected
    public are changed by this rule. DHS believes the public will welcome
    this change. The public needs no time to conform its conduct so as to
    avoid violation of these regulations because the rule relieves a
    requirement of the existing regulations. Further, this rule will have
    no adverse impact on DHS' adjudicatory responsibilities or ability to
    track the foreign travel of affected persons since DHS already records
    the admission of all nonimigrants. For these reasons, this rule is
    effective immediately under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and (3).
    This rule relates to internal agency management, and, therefore, is
    exempt from the provisions of Executive Order Nos. 12630, 12988, 13045,
    13132, 13175, 13211, and 13272. This rule is not considered by DHS to
    be a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
    section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, it has not
    been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Further, this
    action is not a proposed rule requiring an initial or final regulatory
    flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
    et seq. In addition, this rule is not subject to the National
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., Title
    II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. Ch. 17A, 25,
    or the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501, note.
    Finally, under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-
    13, all Departments are required to submit to the Office of Management
    and Budget (OMB), for review and approval, any reporting requirements
    inherent in a rule. This rule does not affect any information
    collections, reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the
    Paperwork Reduction Act.

    List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 245

    Aliens, Immigration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, part 245 of chapter 1 of title 8 of the Code of Federal
    Regulations is amended as follows:

    PART 245--ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR
    PERMANENT RESIDENCE

    1. The authority citation for part 245 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1182, 1255; sec. 202, Pub. L.
    105-100, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193; sec. 902, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
    2681; 8 CFR part 2.

    2. Section 245.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(C) as
    follows:


    Sec. 245.2 Application.

    (a) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (C) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for
    adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or
    removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-1 or L-1 status shall not be
    deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this
    country, the alien remains eligible for H or L status, is coming to
    resume employment with the same employer for whom he or she had
    previously been authorized to work as an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant, and,
    is in possession of a valid H or L visa (if required). The travel
    outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status
    who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who
    is in lawful H-4 or L-2 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of
    the application if the spouse or parent of such alien through whom the
    H-4 or L-2 status was obtained is maintaining H-1 or L-1 status and the
    alien remains otherwise eligible for H-4 or L-2 status, and, the alien
    is in possession of a valid H-4 or L-2 visa (if required). The travel
    outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status,
    who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who
    is in lawful K-3 or K-4 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of
    the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien is in
    possession of a valid K-3 or K-4 visa and remains eligible for K-3 or
    K-4 status.

    Dated: October 15, 2007.
    Michael Chertoff,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. E7-21506 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4410-10-P



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. haircuts for fine hair women
  • haircuts for fine hair women



  • gc_on_demand
    04-04 07:38 AM
    Lets post here if you are Post July 2007 applicant and have received email /mail from NVC ( National Visa Center ) to pay visa fees. Share your PD and other details you received from NVC.

    People who have selected CP option in their I 140 application will get notice for fees from NVC.

    Note : NVC sends out fee invoice in advance if they think date will be current for given applicant in near future. ( Approx 4-6 months ). I have read on internet that people with PD up to Nov 2007 are getting fees invoice. I want to track if any IV members beyond July 2007 got such invoice. This will be true indicator where date will land in last quarter.





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • colorbones
    10-05 01:40 PM
    That's the good or bad news????
    i won this program in 2003. i just got the hand written "adjust status" in my passport from immigration officer but i never got GC from them....:p

    they give you a chance to live here legally and then they try to kick you out.

    now.. i'm an illegal.. in U.S :confused:

    that's why they call lottery :cool:



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. Hairstyles for Women over
  • Hairstyles for Women over



  • whiteStallion
    05-15 03:16 PM
    You are right. These certifications may add some value when applying for H1B Visa but not for GC Processing with USCIS. You can just ignore those certifications....

    I would like to clarify one thing....

    Are these Certifications from Sun Microsystems, Oracle and IBM consider as supporting documents for 4 year degree or equivalent to any educational qualifications or experience?
    I mean, people are doing these certifications even with out a job or while on bench....

    I do not want to degrade or project these certifications in low profile or so, I do know the value of these certifications while searching for a job, but could not understand how they will help you in education or experience with USCIS.

    Correct me if I am wrong.....

    - B+ve





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. styles for women over 50.
  • styles for women over 50.



  • rb_248
    10-19 04:27 PM
    Did you have to change your address while you switched jo?. And if you had changed address, did you inform USCIS. I am trying to find out if address chnge is what triggers RFE for job switch. Also were you on H1B or using EAD with previous employer.

    I moved out of state. I owned a home and it took a while to sell. So I stayed at a temporary facility. So effectively I retained the same address. But, we got the cards just before we sold the house. So the answer to your question is No I did not inform USCIS. But, I had a justification not to inform the USCIS.



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles for fine
  • short hair styles for fine



  • msr1234
    04-16 05:03 PM
    Yes, Today morning





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. short hair styles for fine
  • short hair styles for fine



  • senk1s
    08-19 11:22 PM
    We did not return the i94 while traveling by air - and our renewal notice was with i94 (same number)



    more...


    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • paskal
    02-22 06:14 PM
    Not sure if people understood the question. Based on this data it shows India got much more then what was in the quota and there were more GC given than the yearly total limit. If this is true, why do I keep hearing that in forums that there were 250K visa's over the last 5 years that were lost because they GC's were not processed in time? If anything there were more visa's given and a disproportionately higher # for India.

    suggest you read the ombudsman report.
    and yes the numbers available were higher because
    1. a recapture was in progress
    2. recaptured visas were fifo not by country quota

    and country quota is deceptive. when ROW is current, eg last july, uscis gives out GC numbers by fifo availability not by country quota.
    of course last july was a freak...not coming back anytime soon!





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50
  • hair styles for women over 50



  • GC_1000Watt
    05-20 12:52 PM
    Hello Gurus,
    I am planning for H1B visa stamping at Mumbai consulate in July this year. I am not aware of the current extension process. I will appreciate if anybody can share his/her knowledge on the same.

    FYI: I have got my first H1B extension for the next 3 years & i am with the same company all this period.

    As far as my information goes, i will first have to get HDFC receipt by asking somebody in India to fill the visa fees on my behalf. and then I have to fill DS156 & DS157 electronically?

    Kindly share your knowledge, thoughts and advices.

    Thanks in advance.





    hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50; hair styles for women over 50. Eye4Desyn. Apr 4, 11:39 AM. No sir, I don#39;t like it.
  • hair styles for women over 50 with fine. hair styles for women over 50; hair styles for women over 50. Eye4Desyn. Apr 4, 11:39 AM. No sir, I don#39;t like it.



  • sara_apk
    04-16 07:14 PM
    Hi Sara,

    Could you please post you case details & PD?

    I don't remember all the details of my case.
    Mine is PD: Oct 2002/EB2
    Labor got approved in Mar 2007
    I-140 premium processing and got approved in May 2007
    I-485 got approved on Apr 01, 2008





    NewDocinUS
    02-05 01:21 PM
    Hi,
    I am a doctor from India and came to US on B1/B2 visa. I have cleared my Step1 and step2 USMLE and preparing for CS Exam. I am looking for a observership or externship oppertunity.

    I applied and called a lot of places but no luck because of my visa situation. Please let me know if anyone here knows of any hospitals offering observerships for IMGs.

    Thanks





    lghtslpr
    02-08 12:26 PM
    Someone over at immigrationportal.com is organizing a letter-writing campaign to demand transparency at the Philadelphia Backlog Processing Center. I think it's a great idea. Please participate. See details here:

    http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1352681&postcount=10560



    + Add Your Comment